Bump, Bump, Bump – how a Royal Park welcomes cyclists

The diggers start early in Hyde Park

IMG_6059

Lots of smiling faces in one of the most beautiful spots in London. But when I saw the guy in the blue T-shirt throw his hands up to the heavens last Friday morning at 7.30am, I thought he might be screaming at yet another digger rearranging the scenery.

Why does Hyde Park matter?

image

This area of green is like the lungs of London, the handkerchief the city sneezes into. It is London’s biggest central park: 625 acres if you include the land around Kensington Palace. In fact Hyde Park is bigger than Monaco. It also — and this is why the diggers are appearing — is taking the strain as thousands of cyclists use it to get to work. If you look at this photo, my route takes me from the red cross (which is actually the south-west corner) to the yellow circle (Marble Arch, the western end of Oxford Street). It’s two glorious miles of no vehicles and relative safety.

So why the diggers?

IMG_6056

Speed bumps. The way to stop cyclists roaring through the park at 25 mph is apparently to insert cobbles at regular intervals. This set are on the gentle side. But sadly this is not where the story ends.

Must be dangerous, all those bikes

IMG_6048

Really? I guess they might be. But at the moment the cycles are pinned back to a tiny number of routes inside the park. Cycling on this one, I got photobombed by the rather adorable tourist. She is on the walkway, I am on the cycle path — the white line dividing us. That is how it should be. Incidentally, I’m always ready for a pedestrian with their back to me to veer right. That’s part of the deal too.

Pinned back?

IMG_6051

I always think if a Martian landed in London and looked at the signs, she would think the name of the city was CYCLISTS DISMOUNT. To ensure the park remains largely cycle-free, the lanes where cycling is allowed have lots of painted instructions. The most important thing for me to know is that I have to stay where the bike icon is and not turn right (into the path where it says “NO CYCLING”). Which means that in 95% of the park a person can stroll around without needing to worry that a bike will zing past their ear.

You don’t mind that?

IMG_6053

Me? Not at all. Because I’m also a walker and a driver and I think that being able to take my two wheels on a secure route inside Hyde Park for 1.5 miles every morning is a privilege.

So what’s the problem?

 

IMG_6081

This is the problem. The latest series of cobbled speed bumps have been installed by a group of workmen who evidently loathe cyclists. Anyone with any attachments on their bike — mine has a chain, paniers, a front basket with my work gear in, oh and me by the way — gets bounced around like Tim Peake in a meteor shower. The cycle lane in the park was closed for three months while these were built, meaning I had to take my chances on Bayswater and Oxford Street, both unpleasant and risky roads for someone on two wheels.

Justify the phrase “loathes cyclists”?

IMG_6083

The penny dropped when I saw this set of four new speed bumps packed into in a short distance of about twenty yards. The first are made in a way that slows you down but doesn’t bang your bike around. But set four, which you can see further down the path, are altogether more aggressive.

So what? If you go slowly, you’ll be fine

IMG_6082

That is not really the point. Cyclists have decided they don’t like the bumps, and they are starting to break the rules. Look what has happened next to this rather modest one — already, after three months, a path is being worn beside it where riders simply won’t accept the new arrangement. I am not saying this behaviour is justifiable. It’s a terrible shame. But this is a classic case of unintended consequences.

That looks terrible!

IMG_6084

Oh, it’s not the worst. There seems to be a formula. Where a bump has been put in place by a vengeful construction worker — who doubtless felt inconvenienced by cyclists on his way to work, or just hates all cyclists for no reason — the cobbles are especially outstanding. The higher the bump, the greater the number of cyclists taking evasive action. This means, as you see in the photo, parts of the park are genuinely being ruined. My formula:

Height of cobbles in millimetres x 25 = number of cyclists per hour riding round the side

So, a simple case of bad behaviour. Ticket them!

IMG_6091

Maybe. But we all have to give and take. I didn’t much appreciate the lorry parked across the walkway last week which meant that no cyclist could see if a pedestrian was about to step out in front of them. That said, cyclists don’t always help themselves. The guy in the shorts zooming into frame saw me take a picture and for some reason shouted SCUMBAG as he rode past me. Guys like him have a battlefield mentality and it’s not conducive to a peaceful walk.

IMG_6018

Then again, getting overtaken by one of the Queen’s official lawnmowers as I tried to comply with the park’s theoretical 5mph speed limit is not conducive to a peaceful ride. Having had an experience with a police speed gun a while back, I do understand it is important to obey the rules. But accepting others is the key.

Back on the road?

IMG_6061

I just can’t shake the feeling, as I go through Hyde Park, that it is not really there for cyclists — and the authorities wish we would use the far-more-dangerous roads instead. On the right, behind the fence, is the park. On the left, with the bus, is famous Park Lane. Maybe the message in the turbo-speed-bumps is that the Royal Parks want me back on the road. You can see why I might not be so keen.

Jeremy Vine official website

6 Comments

  • Bob Birch says:

    Good read Jeremy but hen again I would expect little else. As a cyclist here in Shropshire much of the available cycling is through one massive park! That said we have our problems too. I used to live in the small market town of Bridgnorth and the locals complained that traffic regularly clogged up the streets. It never surprised me – when those streets were made the mode of transport was horse and cart. That’s the price you pay for living in such surroundings. Now in Telford we have an infrastructure where the car is king. Only recently have the council come to cater for cyclists but whilst this is welcome the only real change will come when the person sat in the cosy metal box realises that there really is room for all of us. Some hope!!!!

  • Marion Lowe says:

    I detest speed bumps -they are quite moderate in Winslow where I live, but if I go over them, all my shopping bounces out of my basket – one one occasion I was reduced to fishing under a parked car to collect a roll of tape. I do hope they get the message and remove them. Surely a cycle lane is a cycle lane – why would they feel the need to impede cyclists? – rather they should have a look at Amsterdam in the rush hour!

  • Ron Reid says:

    Your question of why we don’t ticket people for bad behaviour is pertinent. We seem to have abandoned the concept of penalising anti-social behaviour in favour of engineering solutions. The problem is that engineering solutions don’t fix behavior, they’re indiscriminate and just punish those who obey the rules.

    More aggressive examples of these engineering solutions can be found all along the towpaths managed by the Canal River Trust. Barriers intended to block quad bikes and motorcyclists present a challenge to a standard bicycle. If you need to use any mobility device, tow your kids in a bike buggy, or ride a trike, then sorry, these recreational facilities aren’t for you.

    Of course these barriers don’t work. The illicit byways past are beyond the ken of the innocent and like the rumble strips in the park the barriers just punish the legitimate users of the facility.

    Is this just a British thing? I’ve cycled in the Netherlands and Germany and never seen the like. They don’t need to turn their recreation paths into obstacle courses because they still have their social contracts in place, those behavioral conventions that make societies work.

    Social contracts are easily maintained, as social creatures it’s in our nature, but they’re also easily lost. Even the most orderly of us need to be told from time to time that we’ve lost the plot. Replacing social censure as means of managing behavior with tax funded vandalism is a very stupid way of losing them.

  • Mick McSorley says:

    This is what you need Jeremy…

    [img]http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view6/3788631/flying-bat-on-bike-o.gif[/img]

    He’s not quite got the aerodynamics right, but with a little tweaking the idea has wings…

  • Simon Parker says:

    In an EU publication entitled ‘Cycling: the way ahead for towns and cities’, it is suggested that “the worst enemies” of the bicycle in the built-up area are not motor vehicles but “longheld prejudices”. For what it’s worth I think the prejudice is against cyclists — and a certain type of cyclist at that — and not against cycling, but in this instance the point is a moot one because we have all been tarred with the same brush.

    The shame of it is that in 2005 — i.e. before the days of social media — a Radio 4 audience voted the bicycle the greatest invention of all time. Out of a shortlist of ten it got 59% of the vote (i.e. more than the other nine combined).

    Personally I would prefer that the Royal Parks provide for cycling in a way that conflict with pedestrians is avoided. On Clapham Common they built another path adjacent to the existing one, separated by a strip of grass, one for cycling, the other for walking. If that’s what it takes, so be it. But for the Royal Parks to stand there, Canute-like, against swelling tide of cyclists, is doing literally nothing to help improve this situation.

  • Paul C says:

    I use HP regularly and there is a small-mindedness about how the custodians consider cyclists, if they did more consultation with us they might come up with more practical solutions. During the works I am inundated by signs telling me where I can’t cycle rather than telling me where I can to get past the works. I’ll certainly avoid the bumps on my fold-up and that’s a shame but inevitable, my wheels are narrow and those gaps look dangerous.
    Most of the tourists ignore all of the signage in any event, so it seems to be a campaign against London cyclists. Hopefully those stones will be removed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *